Limitations and relation to source–readout research

Limitations and relation to source–readout research

The abstract completion order and internal-identifiability ceilings are unchanged. Our finite tools make a nominated sufficiency question effective and optimize access within a declared menu; they do not select a physically separate or ontologically unique source. In continuous projected dynamics, the existing all-initial-state closure criterion remains a separate theorem[12]. A small tensor response quotient is not a quantum-memory minimum, and a computationally reconstructed distinction is not automatically a readable physical record. The conditional asymptotic transfers do not supply a better general SAT exponent than their external inputs. Wider novelty and publication priority require separate assessment.