This section supplies the nonlinear step behind the radial proof. It is useful precisely because the actual clock/pointer marginal need not have a positive lower bound. Let q=ψ(S,⋅) be a radial spinor slice, u=ψS, z=ψSS, a=∥q∥, η=q/a, and let Pr multiply by 1[0,r]. Set K=⟨η,Prη⟩ and Zη=(Pr−K)η. The constant clock carrier is removed from all derivatives, but its actual drift is retained in continuity.
For two live conditioning coordinates S,Z, the right side is the sum of the corresponding two functionals, with coefficients ℏ/M and 1/(μZT0) respectively.
Proof
Write w=∫ρdr, Ar=∫0rρdy, and K=Ar/w. Let δB and δj be the cumulative and full clock-current integrals after subtracting the constant carrier. Continuity and zero origin flux give
dtdK=ρδJKS−w∂SδB−K∂Sδj.
The radial current has cancelled pointwise against Krr˙. Now KS=2ℜ⟨q,(Pr−K)u⟩/a2 and ∂SδB−K∂Sδj=κℑ⟨q,(Pr−K)z⟩; the u†u term is real. Substitution proves (12). Applying continuity with both transverse currents gives the two summands, not an additional mixed-derivative term. Each local product sums the original spinor components. No component has been sampled as an actual sector.
□
Lemma 24.2 (Stability without an exact-marginal denominator)
For normalized ψ,G, write E=ψ−G, and suppose the quantities
follow by adding and subtracting q/b, by projection variance, and by ∣Kη−Kξ∣≤2∥η−ξ∥. Split the first term of (12) first in u−U and then in normalized directions. Its derivative part is at most 4∥U∥d1+2d12; its direction part is at most 7∥η−ξ∥∥U∥2≤14d∥U∥2/b. For the second term, the z−V part is at most ad2. Splitting the remaining amplitude, density and projection yields (d/2+4b∥η−ξ∥)∥V∥≤9d∥V∥. Integrate these inequalities and use Cauchy–Schwarz and ∫a2dS=1. If a=0, direct bounding of F[G] works with d=b; if b=0 and its derivatives vanish, the bound 2d12+ad2 suffices. Thus zero fibres are included, not discarded.
□
For G=ϕ(S−Sc−vt)u(S,r) with real ϕ and normalized u,
The last equality is a direct trigonometric integral for the unsmoothed cosine packet. Positive convolution and weighted Cauchy–Schwarz give ϕ′2/ϕ≤Z−1κ∗(ϕ0′2/ϕ0); Young's inequality then adds only the normalization multiplier at most 1.000001. No actual conditional law is asserted uniform in this argument.
Lemma 24.3 (Deterministic-time CDF interface)
For every measurable radial cut b(S),
∫w(S)∣Kψ(S,b(S))−KG(S,b(S))∣dS≤2∥ψ−G∥.
Under the already transported actual-law cap C, the corresponding binary-test mismatch is at most 2C∥ψ−G∥ per cut.
Proof
Multiply the CDF difference by w=∫∣ψ∣2. The exact identity is
w(Kψ−KG)=∫(1r≤b−KG)(∣ψ∣2−∣G∣2)dr.
The coefficient has modulus at most one and the density difference has L1 norm at most 2∥ψ−G∥. Uniformity of the exact rank under its own conditional wave measure identifies this integral with the test mismatch. Domination then supplies the actual-law bound. Zero comparison fibres are charged by their exact mass. The same proof works with live conditioning pair (S,Z). It is a fixed-time result; it is not substituted at a random clock hitting time.