Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Section 20 4 October 2026

A conservative flow for the effective model

Reading position 23 of 37

20 A conservative flow for the effective model

For current-based existence background see [11]. The three active kinetic operators have positive coefficients. The pointer-linear term has bounded clock coefficients and is infinitesimally bounded relative to the free kinetic plus oscillator operator. Square completion gives a finite lower bound on the potential. Consequently the full operator is self-adjoint on that reference operator's domain.

After odd extension in rr, the original stock belongs to D(H2)D(H^2). The writer coefficients vanish on its clock support. Functional calculus therefore gives Ψ∈CtD(H2)\Psi\in C_tD(H^2) and ∂tΨ∈CtD(H)\partial_t\Psi\in C_tD(H). The writer potential has the locally bounded weak second derivatives needed for local elliptic regularity: B9B_9 is C4C^4, while its occurrence through b′′b'' gives only the required C2C^2 statement. Thus D(H2)⊂Hloc4D(H^2)\subset H^4_{\rm loc} and D(H)⊂Hloc2D(H)\subset H^2_{\rm loc}. In three active dimensions these imply the local continuity and local Lipschitz velocity needed for a unique nonnodal guiding flow. No unjustified H6H^6 claim for the writer is used.

Energy conservation and ∥HΨ∥<∞\|H\Psi\|<\infty give, on any finite interval,

∫ ⁣ dt∫∣Jj∣ dq≤ℏmj∫ ⁣ dt ∥Ψ∥∥∂jΨ∥<∞,∫ ⁣ dt∫ρ ∣Dtlog⁡ρ∣ dq≤∫ ⁣ dt(2∥Ψ∥∥∂tΨ∥+2∑jℏmj∥∂jΨ∥2)<∞.\begin{aligned}\int\!\dd t\int |J_j|\dd q &\leq\frac{\hbar}{m_j}\int\!\dd t\,\|\Psi\|\|\partial_j\Psi\|<\infty,\\ \int\!\dd t\int \rho\,|D_t\log\rho|\dd q &\leq\int\!\dd t\left(2\|\Psi\|\|\partial_t\Psi\| +2\sum_j\frac{\hbar}{m_j}\|\partial_j\Psi\|^2\right)<\infty. \end{aligned}

Stopped partial equivariance and exhaustion exclude finite-time escape and node hitting almost surely. The origin is an odd-extension node. The free centre flow and constant angular factors then restore the two-body Cartesian description. Domination (8) transfers the null exceptional set and transports the same cap along this one flow. The much higher-dimensional interacting finite-field model requires its own existence proof.