Skip to content
Shadow Theory

The same-ball detection theorem

An explicit transverse AdS perturbation has zero first variations and positive canonical energy at every radius.

4. Detection at every radius

Theorem 4.1 (All-radii same-ball detection). In AdS4_4 with G=ℓ=1G=\ell=1, take hxy=hyx=z(t2+z2/5+1/3)h_{xy}=h_{yx}=z(t^2+z^2/5+1/3) and set the other components to zero. For every rest-frame ball at t=0t=0, both first-order readouts vanish. Its wedge canonical energy is

EB(h)=πR6138600(29R4+110R2+165)>0,R>0.(14)\mathcal E_B(h)=\frac{\pi R^6}{138600}(29R^4+110R^2+165)>0,\qquad R>0. \tag{14}

The result is wedge-local. If an admissible vacuum family has this tangent on the wedge, (14) gives its FB′′(0)F_B''(0).

Proof: the first-order cancellation. Write hxy=zH(t,z)h_{xy}=zH(t,z). The linearized vacuum equation reduces to Htt−Hzz−4Hz/z=0H_{tt}-H_{zz}-4H_z/z=0. For the polynomial, both HttH_{tt} and Hzz+4Hz/zH_{zz}+4H_z/z equal 22. Its boundary normalizable coefficient has no tttt component, so the energy variation is zero. In the area variation the hemisphere projector contracts with the shear to give (x−x0)(y−y0)(x-x_0)(y-y_0) times an axially symmetric factor. Reflect either coordinate about its central diameter and the integral changes sign on the same hemisphere. It vanishes. The companion edition derives the more general fixed-frame linear kernel.

Proof: the extremal-surface response. The tangent is translation invariant, so compute at the centred ball. In spherical coordinates (ϱ,θ,φ)(\varrho,\theta,\varphi) on the slice, z=ϱcos⁡θz=\varrho\cos\theta. Write the radial graph as ϱ=R+λw+O(λ2)\varrho=R+\lambda w+O(\lambda^2) and set s=sin⁡θs=\sin\theta, c=cos⁡θc=\cos\theta. The minimizing first-order displacement is

w∗=f(θ)sin⁡(2φ),f=−R4120s2c3(2R2c2+R2+5).(15)w_*=f(\theta)\sin(2\varphi),\qquad f=-\frac{R^4}{120}s^2c^3(2R^2c^2+R^2+5). \tag{15}

After integrating out the azimuthal dependence, the forced sector satisfies

R4(21R2c2+25)s4c4−30(s3+s)f′+120cf−30s2cf′′=0.(16)R^4(21R^2c^2+25)s^4c^4-30(s^3+s)f'+120cf-30s^2cf''=0. \tag{16}

Substituting (15) gives zero. Its O(s2)O(s^2) behaviour at the pole is regular; its O(c3)O(c^3) behaviour at the anchor keeps the anchors fixed. The positive shape Hessian gives uniqueness in the admissible space.

Proof: evaluate the bulk and surface terms. The bulk term in the second-order charge–area identity uses

D2Ftt[h,h]∣t=0=z430(69z4+130z2+45).(17)\left.D^2\mathcal F_{tt}[h,h]\right|_{t=0}=\frac{z^4}{30}(69z^4+130z^2+45). \tag{17}

To see the bulk coefficient, use time symmetry: the extrinsic curvature of the slice vanishes along the affine metric path, so the varying part of Ftt\mathcal F_{tt} is z−2R(3)/2z^{-2}\mathcal R^{(3)}/2, with R(3)\mathcal R^{(3)} the scalar curvature of the spatial metric. Rotate x,yx,y by 45∘45^\circ to diagonalize the shear. In proper radial coordinate σ=−log⁡z\sigma=-\log z, the two transverse scale factors are a±=z−11±λz3(z2/5+1/3)a_\pm=z^{-1}\sqrt{1\pm\lambda z^3(z^2/5+1/3)}. Differentiate the spatial scalar curvature −2(a+′′/a++a−′′/a−+a+′a−′/(a+a−))-2(a_+''/a_++a_-''/a_-+a_+'a_-'/(a_+a_-)) twice in λ\lambda, with primes here denoting σ\sigma derivatives, to obtain (17).

At fixed zz the transverse disk has radius R2−z2\sqrt{R^2-z^2}. On it ξBt=π(R2−z2−r2)/R\xi_B^t=\pi(R^2-z^2-r^2)/R; integrating over the disk gives π2(R2−z2)2/(2R)\pi^2(R^2-z^2)^2/(2R). The fixed-surface term comes from differentiating the induced area density qθθqφφ−qθφ2\sqrt{q_{\theta\theta}q_{\varphi\varphi}-q_{\theta\varphi}^2} of the radial graph. With X=q0−1δqX=q_0^{-1}\delta q on the fixed hemisphere, its second derivative is the reference density times (tr⁡X)2/4−tr⁡(X2)/2(\operatorname{tr}X)^2/4-\operatorname{tr}(X^2)/2. For the shape term, insert the proper normal displacement w∗/(Rc)w_* /(R c) in the shape Hessian. Denote the bulk integral including its 1/(8π)1/(8\pi) prefactor by II. The three terms are

Agg=−4πR62027025(3717R4+15210R2+16445),(18)A_{gg}=-\frac{4\pi R^6}{2027025}(3717R^4+15210R^2+16445), \tag{18} Q[w∗]=πR64054050(567R4+2730R2+3575),(19)Q[w_*]=\frac{\pi R^6}{4054050}(567R^4+2730R^2+3575), \tag{19} I=πR641580(69R4+286R2+297).(20)I=\frac{\pi R^6}{41580}(69R^4+286R^2+297). \tag{20}

Then −Agg/4+Q[w∗]/4−I-A_{gg}/4+Q[w_*]/4-I simplifies to (14). □\square

Positivity without solving for the surface

Set the trial displacement to zero in the shape minimization. This gives a lower bound directly:

EB(h)≥−Agg4−I=πR68108100(1413R4+5070R2+7865)>0.(21)\mathcal E_B(h)\ge -\frac{A_{gg}}4-I =\frac{\pi R^6}{8108100}(1413R^4+5070R^2+7865)>0. \tag{21}

The bound holds at every R>0R>0. The fixed-surface value is already positive, and allowing the surface to relax adds Q[w∗]/4Q[w_*]/4.

Independent symplectic evaluations

The direct symplectic calculation uses (15) as the normal gauge data at B~\widetilde B. The mixed and normal-block Hollands–Wald conditions give the required first normal derivatives of the other components. Integrate the current and the surface correction. The totals are 38π/1732538\pi/17325 at R=1R=1 and 8552π/173258552\pi/17325 at R=2R=2, agreeing with (14). At R=1R=1 the bulk and surface split is π/675+37π/51975\pi/675+37\pi/51975. Varying the free gauge data leaves the sum unchanged.

For the AdS3_3 black-brane benchmark from [1], the split in units G=ℓ=1G=\ell=1 is −2R4/15+7R4/45=R4/45-2R^4/15+7R^4/45=R^4/45. This is also the second derivative of the leading relative entropy λ2R4/90\lambda^2R^4/90 for the exact family. Dropping the surface correction would reverse the benchmark's sign. The vacuum and a boundary-trivial pure-gauge tangent both give zero. The controls check the orientation, the Hessian normalization and cancellation of the gauge-dependent terms.

Published source: Second-Order Detection by Boundary Balls in a Source–Readout Architecture. Read the original PDF alongside the web treatment.