Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Section 3 9 October 2026

The logarithmic chain rule and deterministic selection

Reading position 4 of 16

3 The logarithmic chain rule and deterministic selection

Assumption 3.1 (Continuous first-domain wave and complete current)

The wave has a specified representative

Ψ∈C([0,T]×D)∩L∞(0,T;Hloc2(D)),∂tΨ∈L1(0,T;L2(D)). \Psi\in C([0,T]\times D) \cap L^\infty(0,T;H^2_{\mathrm{loc}}(D)), \qquad \partial_t\Psi\in L^1(0,T;L^2(D)).

It is globally continuous in L2L^2 and normalized. Continuity in spacetime is an additional assumption; H2H^2 alone does not imply it in arbitrary dimension. The current satisfies the preceding conservative continuity and zero-on-nodes hypotheses, with finite ℓ,A\ell,\mathcal A, and

N=∫0T ⁣∫D(∣∂tρ∣+∣j⋅∇ρ∣ρ) dx dt<∞. \mathcal N=\int_0^T\!\int_D \left(|\partial_t\rho| +\frac{|j\cdot\nabla\rho|}{\rho}\right)\,dx\,dt<\infty. (3.1)

For each compact spacetime set K⊂U={(t,x)∈[0,T]×D:ρt(x)>0}K\subset U=\{(t,x)\in[0,T]\times D:\rho_t(x)>0\} there is a smooth spacetime cutoff equal to one near KK, supported inside UU relative to [0,T]×D[0,T]\times D, for which the zero-extended field B=χbB=\chi b belongs to L1(0,T;W1,p(Rd))L^1(0,T;W^{1,p}(\mathbb R^d)) for some p>1p>1. The exponent and norm may depend on KK.

A reference-compatible path law exists, and its paths stay in DD throughout the interval. For any other path law to which the uniqueness conclusion is applied, the same boundary avoidance is assumed or established by Proposition 2.3.

The cutoff formulation makes precise what local Sobolev regularity on positive spacetime tubes means. It does not impose a global lower bound on ρ\rho or on div⁡b\operatorname{div}b.

Lemma 3.2 (Sobolev logarithmic chain rule)

Under Assumption 3.1, every CC-marginal-dominated path law PP staying in DD satisfies, for each ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

ddtlog⁡(ρt(γ(t))+ϵ)=∂tρ+b⋅∇ρρ+ϵ(t,γ(t)) \frac{d}{dt}\log(\rho_t(\gamma(t))+\epsilon) =\frac{\partial_t\rho+ b\cdot\nabla\rho}{\rho+\epsilon}(t,\gamma(t)) (3.2)

for almost every time on almost every path. The left side is the derivative of an absolutely continuous function. Moreover

EPVar⁡[0,T]log⁡(ρt(γ(t))+ϵ)≤CN. \mathbb E_P\operatorname{Var}_{[0,T]} \log(\rho_t(\gamma(t))+\epsilon) \leq C\mathcal N. (3.3)

Consequently PP-almost every path avoids every density node at every time, and for a0>a>0a_0>a>0,

P{inf⁡tρt(γ(t))≤a}≤P{ρ0(γ(0))≤a0}+CNlog⁡(a0/a). P\{\inf_t\rho_t(\gamma(t))\leq a\} \leq P\{\rho_0(\gamma(0))\leq a_0\} +\frac{C\mathcal N}{\log(a_0/a)}. (3.4)
Proof

First restrict PP to paths whose complete graphs lie in a fixed compact subset KK of [0,T]×D[0,T]\times D; no positive-density restriction is used at this step. Denote this subprobability by PKP_K. Its time marginals only decrease, so are still at most Cρt dxC\rho_t\,dx and are bounded on the compact spatial region by continuity of Ψ\Psi. Choose a slightly larger compact region inside the physical domain and locally extend the wave. At the time endpoints a constant extension suffices. Spacetime mollification produces smooth waves Ψn\Psi_n converging uniformly on KK, with strong convergence of spatial first derivatives in L2(dt dx)L^2(dt\,dx) and of time derivatives in Lt1Lx2L^1_tL^2_x locally. These follow from the stipulated continuity, local H2H^2 and time-derivative hypotheses.

For fixed ϵ>0\epsilon>0, the map z↦log⁡(∥z∥2+ϵ)z\mapsto\log(\|z\|^2+\epsilon) has bounded first derivative. Uniform convergence of Ψn\Psi_n on the compact region, together with its uniformly bounded values, therefore gives uniform convergence of hn=log⁡(∥Ψn∥2+ϵ)h_n=\log(\|\Psi_n\|^2+\epsilon) to h=log⁡(ρ+ϵ)h=\log(\rho+\epsilon). The chain formulas and the strong derivative convergences give

∇hn⟶∇hin L2(dt dx),∂thn⟶∂thin Lt1Lx2. \nabla h_n\longrightarrow\nabla h\quad\hbox{in }L^2(dt\,dx), \qquad \partial_t h_n\longrightarrow\partial_t h \quad\hbox{in }L^1_tL^2_x.

For example, subtract the two bounded coefficient factors multiplying ∂tΨn\partial_t\Psi_n and ∂tΨ\partial_t\Psi; their uniform difference tends to zero and the latter derivative is integrable. The spatial argument is identical in L2L^2.

The smooth chain rule holds for hnh_n along every admitted absolutely continuous curve. The expected time-derivative error tends to zero by the bounded local marginals and Cauchy on the finite spatial volume. If θt dx=(et)#PK\theta_t\,dx=(e_t)_\#P_K, the spatial error is bounded by

∫θ ∣b∣ ∣∇(hn−h)∣≤(∫θ∣b∣2)1/2(∫θ∣∇(hn−h)∣2)1/2≤CA1/2(∫ρ∣∇(hn−h)∣2)1/2⟶0.\begin{aligned}\int\theta\,|b|\,|\nabla(h_n-h)| &\leq \left(\int\theta|b|^2\right)^{1/2} \left(\int\theta|\nabla(h_n-h)|^2\right)^{1/2}\\ &\leq C\mathcal A^{1/2} \left(\int\rho|\nabla(h_n-h)|^2\right)^{1/2} \longrightarrow0 . \end{aligned}

Uniform convergence passes the endpoint values. A subsequence with summable expected derivative error, followed by a countable set of rational endpoints, gives the integral chain identity almost surely. The integral representative and continuity of h(t,γ(t))h(t,\gamma(t)) extend it to every endpoint. This proves absolute continuity and (3.2) on the restricted paths.

Every continuous path staying in DD has a compact graph in [0,T]×D[0,T]\times D. Exhaust these graphs by nested compact regions and take the countable intersection of their full-measure chain-rule sets. By marginal domination,

EPVar⁡h≤C∫∣ρ ∂tρ+j⋅∇ρ∣ρ+ϵ dx dt≤CN. \mathbb E_P\operatorname{Var}h \leq C\int \frac{|\rho\,\partial_t\rho+j\cdot\nabla\rho|} {\rho+\epsilon}\,dx\,dt \leq C\mathcal N .

This establishes (3.3). There is no substitution of a weak density into an unproved classical path chain rule.

The entrance has ρ0>0\rho_0>0 almost surely by domination. For the countable sequence ϵ=1/n\epsilon=1/n, a path starting there and ever reaching a node has variation at least log⁡(ρ0(γ(0))+ϵ)−log⁡ϵ\log(\rho_0(\gamma(0))+\epsilon)-\log\epsilon, which diverges. Fatou and the uniform expectation bound exclude a positive mass of such paths. Since the density is continuous along a node-avoiding path on a compact time interval, it has a positive minimum there. Letting ϵ↓0\epsilon\downarrow0 now bounds the variation of log⁡ρt(γ(t))\log\rho_t(\gamma(t)) by CNC\mathcal N in expectation. A drop from above a0a_0 to aa costs at least log⁡(a0/a)\log(a_0/a), proving (3.4).

□

The use of all time marginals in the proof is essential. A family of sets can have zero mass at each fixed time while almost every path hits one of those sets at some time. The logarithmic variation, rather than fixed-time nullity alone, supplies the all-times conclusion.

Theorem 3.3 (Deterministic reference-compatible selection)

Under Assumption 3.1, the reference-compatible path law is unique. There is a Borel map x↦X(⋅,x)∈Cx\mapsto X(\cdot,x)\in\mathcal C, defined up to a ρ0 dx\rho_0\,dx null set, such that

Π=∫DδX(⋅,x) ρ0(x) dx,(Xt)#(ρ0 dx)=ρt dx. \Pi=\int_D\delta_{X(\cdot,x)}\,\rho_0(x)\,dx, \qquad (X_t)_\#(\rho_0\,dx)=\rho_t\,dx . (3.5)

For almost every such entrance, the path is absolutely continuous, stays in DD, solves the complete guidance equation almost everywhere in time and avoids all nodes.

More generally, two CC-marginal-dominated path laws staying in DD with the same entrance coincide, and their entrance disintegrations are Dirac masses. For every original μ0=f0ρ0 dx\mu_0=f_0\rho_0\,dx the deterministic transported law is (Xt)#μ0(X_t)_\#\mu_0, with its whole history obtained by (2.3). A finite cap is unnecessary for this absolute-continuity and null-set assertion.

Proof

Let P1,P2P_1,P_2 have the same entrance μ0\mu_0 and respective finite marginal caps; enlarge CC to cover both. Disintegrate over entrance and form the conditional product

Θ(dγ,dη)=∫P1,x(dγ)P2,x(dη) μ0(dx). \Theta(d\gamma,d\eta) =\int P_{1,x}(d\gamma)P_{2,x}(d\eta)\,\mu_0(dx). (3.6)

Its coordinate marginals are P1,P2P_1,P_2 and γ(0)=η(0)\gamma(0)=\eta(0) almost surely. By Lemma 3.2 and boundary avoidance, almost every pair of complete graphs lies in some compact Kn⊂UK_n\subset U. For example choose nested compacts with ∣x∣≤n|x|\leq n, distance to DcD^c at least 1/n1/n when relevant, and ρ≥1/n\rho\geq1/n. Restrict Θ\Theta to pairs whose whole graphs lie in KnK_n; call the restriction Θn\Theta_n. It retains marginal bounds Cρt dxC\rho_t\,dx. Paths are not stopped and their mass is not placed on a boundary.

Let B=χbB=\chi b be the positive-tube Sobolev extension supplied by Assumption 3.1. The Sobolev maximal-function inequality [5, Lemmas A.2–A.3] gives, outside an appropriate Lebesgue-null set for almost every tt,

∣B(t,x)−B(t,y)∣≤cd∣x−y∣{M∣∇B∣(t,x)+M∣∇B∣(t,y)}. |B(t,x)-B(t,y)| \leq c_d|x-y| \{\mathcal M|\nabla B|(t,x)+\mathcal M|\nabla B|(t,y)\}. (3.7)

Here M\mathcal M is the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator. Marginal absolute continuity makes its exceptional set negligible along the paired paths for almost every time. Their AC equations and B=bB=b on KnK_n imply, for every δ>0\delta>0,

log⁡ ⁣(1+sup⁡t≤T∣γ(t)−η(t)∣δ)≤cd∫0T{M∣∇B∣(t,γ(t))+M∣∇B∣(t,η(t))} dt. \log\!\left(1+\frac{\sup_{t\leq T}|\gamma(t)-\eta(t)|}{\delta}\right) \leq c_d\int_0^T \{\mathcal M|\nabla B|(t,\gamma(t)) +\mathcal M|\nabla B|(t,\eta(t))\}\,dt . (3.8)

Indeed differentiate log⁡(1+∣γ−η∣/δ)\log(1+|\gamma-\eta|/\delta) almost everywhere, use (3.7), and integrate the nonnegative upper bound; equality at entrance removes the initial term.

The expectation of the right side under Θn\Theta_n is finite and independent of δ\delta. The marginals are supported in a spatial set VnV_n of finite volume and are bounded there by Csup⁡KnρC\sup_{K_n}\rho. Hölder's inequality and the LpL^p boundedness of M\mathcal M bound the expectation by a finite multiple of ∫0T∥∇B(t)∥pdt\int_0^T\|\nabla B(t)\|_pdt. If Θn\Theta_n gave positive mass to sup⁡t∣γ−η∣≥h\sup_t|\gamma-\eta|\geq h for any h>0h>0, the expected left side of (3.8) would diverge as δ↓0\delta\downarrow0. Thus Θn\Theta_n is supported on the diagonal. Exhaustion gives the same conclusion for Θ\Theta.

Apply this first with P1=P2=PP_1=P_2=P. For almost every xx, the product Px⊗PxP_x\otimes P_x is diagonal. A probability on a Polish space whose independent pair is almost surely equal is Dirac: otherwise some member of a countable separating family has probability strictly between zero and one, giving positive product mass off the diagonal. The location of that Dirac mass is a measurable function of xx, because the Dirac embedding of a Polish space into its probability measures is Borel and has a Borel inverse on its image. Defining an arbitrary path on the entrance null set gives a Borel map. Using two different candidate laws in (3.6) makes their selected curves equal almost everywhere, proving uniqueness.

Take P=ΠP=\Pi to obtain (3.5). Finally f0(e0)Πf_0(e_0)\Pi is exactly ∫δX(⋅,x) μ0(dx)\int\delta_{X(\cdot,x)}\,\mu_0(dx). Its absolute continuity with respect to Π\Pi transfers all preceding almost-sure path properties, even if f0f_0 is unbounded.

□

This theorem selects the deterministic flow within the specified reference-compatible or uniformly marginal-dominated classes. It does not assert uniqueness of every classical ODE curve from every point. Additional singular or concentrating solutions outside those classes are not excluded. This distinction is consistent with the regular-flow framework of [7]; no divergence lower bound has been silently introduced. All almost-sure assertions refer to the fixed parent wave and complete current. Uniform estimates over a family require uniform bounds for the displayed hypotheses; they do not assert a common exceptional entrance set for an uncountable family of waves.

3.1 Checking the wave-to-velocity hypotheses

Proposition 3.4 (Continuous first-domain canonical and local spin currents)

Suppose the first line of Assumption 3.1 holds. For

ji=2λiIm⁡⟨Ψ,DiΨ⟩,Di=∂i−iAi, j_i=2\lambda_i\operatorname{Im}\langle\Psi,D_i\Psi\rangle, \qquad D_i=\partial_i-iA_i,

with smooth locally bounded coefficients, locally bounded derivatives, Hermitian AiA_i and positive scalar λi\lambda_i, the positive-tube Sobolev premise holds. For d>2d>2 one can use p=min⁡{2,d/(d−2)}>1p=\min\{2,d/(d-2)\}>1; for d=1,2d=1,2 one can use p=2p=2. The same local conclusion holds after adding smooth Hermitian first-order drift densities and finite-component Pauli curl currents. Their global budgets must still be checked with their actual coefficients.

For the canonical tensor with α≤λi≤Λ\alpha\leq\lambda_i\leq\Lambda, put K(t)=∑i∫λi∥DiΨ∥2dxK(t)=\sum_i\int\lambda_i\|D_i\Psi\|^2dx. Then the following sufficient bounds hold:

∫∣j∣ dx≤2ΛK/α,∫∣j∣2ρ dx≤4Λ2K/α,∫∣j⋅∇ρ∣ρ dx≤4ΛK/α,∫∣∂tρ∣ dx≤2∥∂tΨ∥2.\begin{align}\int|j|\,dx&\leq2\Lambda\sqrt{K/\alpha},& \int\frac{|j|^2}{\rho}\,dx&\leq4\Lambda^2K/\alpha,\notag\\ \int\frac{|j\cdot\nabla\rho|}{\rho}\,dx &\leq4\Lambda K/\alpha,& \int|\partial_t\rho|\,dx&\leq2\|\partial_t\Psi\|_2. \tag{3.9}\end{align}

Thus their time integrals supply the length, action and logarithmic costs whenever the displayed kinetic and time-derivative quantities are integrable.

Proof

Hermiticity gives ∂iρ=2Re⁡⟨Ψ,DiΨ⟩\partial_i\rho=2\operatorname{Re}\langle\Psi,D_i\Psi\rangle. On a compact positive tube, Ψ\Psi is bounded and ρ\rho has a positive floor. Differentiating the current weakly produces only terms of the types ΨD2Ψ\Psi D^2\Psi, (DΨ)2(D\Psi)^2, ΨDΨ\Psi D\Psi and Ψ2\Psi^2, with bounded local coefficients. For d>2d>2, local H2H^2 gives DΨ∈L2d/(d−2)D\Psi\in L^{2d/(d-2)}; the products therefore belong to LpL^p with the stated pp. For d=2d=2, H1H^1 gradients have every finite local LqL^q exponent; choose q=4q=4. The one-dimensional case is stronger. In the quotient rule for b=j/ρb=j/\rho, the remaining product j∇ρ/ρ2j\nabla\rho/\rho^2 has the same squared-first-derivative form. A cutoff supported inside the positive region gives the required global W1,pW^{1,p} extension with integrable time norm.

A Hermitian drift adds ⟨Ψ,aiΨ⟩\langle\Psi,a_i\Psi\rangle, whose first derivative has these same product types. A Pauli curl differentiates a spin density once in jj and twice in ∇j\nabla j, again producing the listed products. This proves the local assertion without differentiating a singular or discontinuous scalar potential.

Finally ∣j∣≤2Λρ ∣DΨ∣|j|\leq2\Lambda\sqrt\rho\,|D\Psi| and ∣∇ρ∣≤2ρ ∣DΨ∣|\nabla\rho|\leq2\sqrt\rho\,|D\Psi| pointwise. Use ∥Ψ∥2=1\|\Psi\|_2=1 and ∫∣DΨ∣2≤K/α\int|D\Psi|^2\leq K/\alpha to obtain the first three bounds. The identity ∂tρ=2Re⁡⟨Ψ,∂tΨ⟩\partial_t\rho=2\operatorname{Re}\langle\Psi,\partial_t\Psi\rangle and Cauchy give the last. Variable unbounded coefficients instead require their corresponding weighted kinetic estimates.

□