Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Section 6 4 October 2026

Internal degrees of freedom

Reading position 7 of 15

6 Internal degrees of freedom

We now use Ss=S(R3N;⨂iC2ji+1)∖{0}\mathscr S_s=\Sch(\R^{3N};\bigotimes_i\C^{2j_i+1})\setminus\{0\}. For each nonzero spin jij_i, let Jix,Jiy,JizJ_i^x,J_i^y,J_i^z be its irreducible spin matrices, acting on that factor. Add to (2.1) the one-body effective Zeeman terms

∑iBi(qi)⋅Ji. \sum_i \mathbf B_i(q_i)\cdot\mathbf J_i . (6.1)

This is a neutral or effective spin Hamiltonian with the current specified in section 2. There is no charged minimal-coupling kinetic term. The additional controls needed are independent real amplitudes of smooth bounded spatial profiles which, on a ball in each particle's physical space, agree with

B(x,y,z)=(z,0,x). \mathbf B(x,y,z)=(z,0,x). (6.2)

A compact divergence-free continuation exists: take the curl of (0,(x2−z2)/2,0)(0,(x^2-z^2)/2,0) multiplied by a cutoff equal to one near the ball. No assumption of arbitrary physical matrix-valued configuration-space controls is made.

Theorem 6.1 (Effective-spin characterization)

For (2.1) and (6.1), with the scalar controls of theorem 2.1 or theorem 5.1, the fixed-interaction hypotheses and the spatial spin controls just specified, assumptions A1–A3 imply (1.1) on every nowhere-zero spinor. Under A4 the conclusion extends to every nonzero Schwartz spinor.

Proof

We give the matrix-generation step explicitly. A Hermitian matrix multiplier M(q)M(q) is a matrix annihilator if DPΨ[−iMΨ]=0D\Pcal_\Psi[-iM\Psi]=0 for every spinor. Scalar phases and scalar coordinate transport have exactly the previous current transformations. Working first with zero Zeeman control, section 3, section 4 therefore supplies all compact scalar annihilators and full compact coordinate covariance, without using scalar uniqueness.

Subtracting a Zeeman control from zero gives its matrix annihilator. Commuting its phase identity with coordinate covariance yields

M annihilating⟹u⋅∇M annihilating M\ \hbox{annihilating}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad u\cdot\nabla M\ \hbox{annihilating} (6.3)

for compact smooth uu; this follows by the same symmetric-second-derivative cancellation as in lemma 3.2, since the commutator with a first-order transport differentiates the multiplier. On the control cell (6.2), the choices u=h(q)ezu=h(q)e_z and u=h(q)exu=h(q)e_x give h(q)Jixh(q)J_i^x and h(q)Jizh(q)J_i^z, respectively, for arbitrary compact full-configuration hh supported over that cell. Coordinate covariance relocates small supports; a partition of unity gives these multipliers for every compact hh.

The matrix identities have both Lie and Jordan closure. Commuting two phase identities gives i[M,N]i[M,N]. To prove the needed Jordan operation, suppose all compact coefficients of a constant Hermitian matrix AA are annihilators. The assignment is invariant under eitfAe^{itfA}. For the scalar Hamiltonian,

−i(e−itfAHeitfA−H)Ψ=t(−A∇f⋅∇−12AΔf)Ψ−it22∣∇f∣2A2Ψ. -i(e^{-itfA}He^{itfA}-H)\Psi =t\left(-A\nabla f\cdot\nabla-\tfrac12A\Delta f\right)\Psi -\frac{it^2}{2}|\nabla f|^2 A^2\Psi.

The norm density is unchanged and the current changes only linearly in tt, by t(Ψ†AΨ)∇ft(\Psi^\dagger A\Psi)\nabla f. Comparison of consistency identities gives ∣∇f∣2A2|\nabla f|^2A^2 as an annihilator. Choose ff so that a derivative of ∣∇f∣2|\nabla f|^2 is nonzero on a prescribed small ball. Equation (6.3), with a vector field dividing by that derivative, then gives hA2hA^2 for every hh supported in the ball. Partitioning gives arbitrary compact coefficients. Polarization of (A+B)2(A+B)^2 yields AB+BAAB+BA; compact cutoffs equal to one on the required supports justify products and commutators throughout.

These operations generate all Hermitian matrices on each irreducible spin factor. Indeed, powers of JzJ^z give its spectral projections by polynomial interpolation. The nonzero adjacent entries of JxJ^x link consecutive eigenvalues. If Pm,PnP_m,P_n are distinct spectral projections, their Jordan products with JxJ^x isolate

PmJxPn+PnJxPm, P_mJ^xP_n+P_nJ^xP_m,

and a commutator with PmP_m gives the corresponding imaginary Hermitian matrix. Adjacent links generate all off-diagonal matrix units by further products and commutators. Diagonal projections supply the rest. Matrices on different factors commute, so their Jordan product is twice their tensor product. We have therefore obtained every compact Hermitian multiplier on the full internal space. This is the point at which irreducibility and spatial variation of the physical controls are used.

Fix a nowhere-zero spinor and a compact field uu with div⁡(ru)=0\diver(ru)=0, where r=Ψ†Ψr=\Psi^\dagger\Psi. Put z=Ψz=\Psi, η=TuΨ\eta=T_u\Psi. Then Re⁡(z†η)=0\operatorname{Re}(z^\dagger\eta)=0. The compactly supported matrix

M=iηz†−izη†r−i(z†η)r2zz† M=\frac{i\eta z^\dagger-iz\eta^\dagger}{r} -\frac{i(z^\dagger\eta)}{r^2}zz^\dagger (6.4)

is smooth and Hermitian and satisfies −iMz=η-iMz=\eta. Indeed, c=z†ηc=z^\dagger\eta is purely imaginary, so η†z=−c\eta^\dagger z=-c. The first numerator in (6.4) is Hermitian, its second coefficient −ic-ic is real, and direct multiplication gives Mz=iηMz=i\eta. Division by rr is harmless on the compact support of η\eta. Matrix annihilation and transport covariance imply div⁡(pΨu)=0\diver(p^\Psi u)=0. The weighted circulations in proposition 3.3 now give pΨ/rp^\Psi/r constant. Normalization, and then the approximation in section A, finish the proof.

□

The same proof applies to a finite-level effective model when its spatial controls yield localized constant matrices whose Jordan and Lie operations generate the full Hermitian algebra. This is an algebraic condition on the controls, not a consequence of having a finite-dimensional internal space. Constant spin rotations alone do not give the spatial matrix identities used above. If the controls preserve proper internal sectors, the theorem must be applied within each accessible sector; no conclusion is claimed for superpositions spanning inaccessible internal sectors. Independent probability masses can remain free for genuinely disjoint invariant configuration sectors, a different situation from overlapping internal components.

For identical particles, independently labeled one-body controls are unavailable. section B states the separate permutation-preserving result, including its nodal hypothesis.