Skip to content
Shadow Theory

Section 3 4 October 2026

From phases to transport and uniqueness

Reading position 4 of 15

3 From phases to transport and uniqueness

The unitary change of variables xi=miqix_i=\sqrt{m_i}q_i, including its constant half-density factor, makes the kinetic energy −Δx/2-\Delta_x/2. It preserves particle blocks, compact support, the Schwartz topology, and condition (2.2). We use these mass-scaled coordinates in the proofs.

3.1 Statistical annihilators

Call a real smooth Schwartz multiplier ff a scalar annihilator if

DPΨ[−ifΨ]=0for every Ψ. D\Pcal_\Psi[-if\Psi]=0\quad\hbox{for every }\Psi. (3.1)

A Schwartz multiplier is a smooth function whose multiplication operator preserves S\Sch continuously; all bounded smooth functions with bounded derivatives, and the polynomial functions used below, qualify. The identities are always local off nodes. Denote their real vector space by A\Acal.

Subtracting (2.3) for two controls shows that every admitted control difference belongs to A\Acal, because a scalar potential does not change the current at a fixed state. This is the initial source of annihilators. There is also a useful closure rule:

fn∈A,fnΨ⟶fΨ in S for each fixed Ψ⟹f∈A. f_n\in\Acal,\quad f_n\Psi\longrightarrow f\Psi\ \hbox{in }\Sch \ \hbox{for each fixed }\Psi \quad\Longrightarrow\quad f\in\Acal. (3.2)

It follows from continuity of the first derivative in A2. All limits below have exactly this meaning; no uniform operator-norm closure is assumed.

For a smooth vector field uu, put

TuΨ=−u⋅∇Ψ−12(div⁡u)Ψ,Aup=−div⁡(up). T_u\Psi=-u\cdot\nabla\Psi-\tfrac12(\diver u)\Psi, \qquad A_u p=-\diver(up). (3.3)

The first is the infinitesimal action on half-densities, and the second is the action on densities.

Lemma 3.1 (Phase and gradient identities)

If f∈Af\in\Acal and its phase multipliers preserve S\Sch, then

DPΨ[T∇fΨ]=A∇fpΨ,∣∇f∣2∈A. D\Pcal_\Psi[T_{\nabla f}\Psi]=A_{\nabla f}p^\Psi, \qquad |\nabla f|^2\in\Acal. (3.4)

Consequently f,g∈Af,g\in\Acal imply

Γ(f,g):=∇f⋅∇g∈A \Gamma(f,g):=\nabla f\cdot\nabla g\in\Acal (3.5)

whenever the displayed multipliers are admissible on S\Sch.

Proof

Integrating (3.1) along eitfΨe^{itf}\Psi gives peitfΨ=pΨp^{e^{itf}\Psi}=p^\Psi, since the nonzero set does not change. Differentiating this identity in the state also intertwines the corresponding first derivatives. For the scalar Hamiltonian HH,

−i(e−itfHeitf−H)Ψ=tT∇fΨ−it22∣∇f∣2Ψ. -i(e^{-itf}He^{itf}-H)\Psi =tT_{\nabla f}\Psi-\frac{it^2}{2}|\nabla f|^2\Psi.

The velocity of eitfΨe^{itf}\Psi is vΨ+t∇fv^\Psi+t\nabla f. Comparing (2.3) at these two states therefore gives a polynomial identity in tt. Its linear and quadratic coefficients give (3.4). Polarizing the second identity proves (3.5).

□
Lemma 3.2 (Transport generation)

If every compactly supported smooth scalar function on Rd\R^d is in A\Acal, then

DPΨ[TuΨ]=AupΨ D\Pcal_\Psi[T_u\Psi]=A_up^\Psi (3.6)

for every u∈Cc∞(Rd;Rd)u\in\Cc(\R^d;\R^d). It follows that

P(UFΨ)=F∗P(Ψ),(UFΨ)(q)=∣det⁡DF−1(q)∣1/2Ψ(F−1(q)), \Pcal(U_F\Psi)=F_*\Pcal(\Psi),\qquad (U_F\Psi)(q)=|\det DF^{-1}(q)|^{1/2}\Psi(F^{-1}(q)), (3.7)

on corresponding nonzero patches, for every finite product FF of flows of such vector fields. The same assertion holds within one particle block if only that block's compact multipliers are known.

Proof

If (3.6) holds for u,vu,v, differentiating the two identities in the directions TvΨ,TuΨT_v\Psi,T_u\Psi and subtracting cancels the symmetric second derivative. To make the regularity requirement explicit, choose a real smooth test function ζ\zeta supported in a compact nonzero patch. Differentiation of the uu-identity and use of the vv-identity gives

⟨D2PΨ[TvΨ,TuΨ]+DPΨ[TuTvΨ],ζ⟩=⟨pΨ,v⋅∇(u⋅∇ζ)⟩. \left\langle D^2\Pcal_\Psi[T_v\Psi,T_u\Psi]+D\Pcal_\Psi[T_uT_v\Psi],\zeta\right\rangle =\left\langle p^\Psi,v\cdot\nabla(u\cdot\nabla\zeta)\right\rangle.

The reversed identity has u,vu,v interchanged. Thus every spatial differentiation can be placed on the test function. With [u,v]=u⋅∇v−v⋅∇u[u,v]=u\cdot\nabla v-v\cdot\nabla u, one has [Tu,Tv]=−T[u,v][T_u,T_v]=-T_{[u,v]} and [Au,Av]=−A[u,v][A_u,A_v]=-A_{[u,v]}. Hence the identity also holds for [u,v][u,v]. The density commutators are interpreted distributionally: this calculation needs functional C2C^2, but not spatial C2C^2, regularity of pΨp^\Psi.

For smooth real ϕ,γ\phi,\gamma, the Euclidean gradient-bracket identity is

ϕ∣∇γ∣2∇γ=−14[∇(ϕγ2),∇γ]−112[∇ϕ,∇(γ3)]−14[∇(γ2),∇(ϕγ)].\begin{align}\phi|\nabla\gamma|^2\nabla\gamma ={}&-\tfrac14[\nabla(\phi\gamma^2),\nabla\gamma] -\tfrac1{12}[\nabla\phi,\nabla(\gamma^3)] \notag\\ &-\tfrac14[\nabla(\gamma^2),\nabla(\phi\gamma)]. \tag{3.8}\end{align}

This is the specialization of [1, Proposition 1, equation (10)]; expansion by the product rule also verifies it directly. For each component uju_j of a compact vector field, choose γj∈Cc∞\gamma_j\in\Cc equal to qjq_j on a neighborhood of its support and take ϕ=uj\phi=u_j. The left side is ujeju_j e_j. Every function on the right is compactly supported. lemma 3.1, bracket closure, and summation prove (3.6).

For completeness, writing a=∇ϕa=\nabla\phi, b=∇γb=\nabla\gamma, P=D2ϕP=D^2\phi, and G=D2γG=D^2\gamma, the three brackets on the right of (3.8), in their displayed order, are

γ2(Ga−Pb)−2γ(a⋅b)b−2γ∣b∣2a−2ϕ∣b∣2b,3γ2(Ga−Pb)+6γ(a⋅b)b,−2γ2(Ga−Pb)+2γ∣b∣2a−2ϕ∣b∣2b.\begin{aligned}&\gamma^2(Ga-Pb)-2\gamma(a\cdot b)b-2\gamma|b|^2a-2\phi|b|^2b,\\ &3\gamma^2(Ga-Pb)+6\gamma(a\cdot b)b,\\ &-2\gamma^2(Ga-Pb)+2\gamma|b|^2a-2\phi|b|^2b. \end{aligned}

Multiplication by −1/4,−1/12,−1/4-1/4,-1/12,-1/4 cancels every term except ϕ∣b∣2b\phi|b|^2b. This verifies the precise local identity used here independently of a transport-group theorem.

Along the half-density flow, (3.6) is the linear transport equation for the assigned density. Its unique local distributional solution is the pushforward: testing against the inverse-transported test function makes its derivative zero. Compact support gives a complete smooth coordinate flow. This proves (3.7); the one-block proof is identical with other coordinates as parameters.

□

These transports are auxiliary actions on states and probability assignments. We have not claimed that UFU_F is a Schrödinger propagator produced by the physical controls.

Proposition 3.3 (Full scalar-control criterion)

For scalar states on Rd\R^d, d≥2d\ge2, assumptions A1–A3 and Cc∞(Rd;R)⊂A\Cc(\R^d;\R)\subset\Acal imply (1.1) on every nowhere-zero state.

Proof

Fix such a state, put r=∣Ψ∣2r=|\Psi|^2, and let uu be compactly supported with div⁡(ru)=0\diver(ru)=0. Then 2Re⁡(Ψ‾TuΨ)=−div⁡(ru)=02\operatorname{Re}(\overline\Psi T_u\Psi)=-\diver(ru)=0. Since the state is scalar and nonzero, TuΨ=−ifΨT_u\Psi=-if\Psi for a real compactly supported smooth ff. The annihilator identity and lemma 3.2 give

0=div⁡(pΨu)=r u⋅∇(pΨ/r). 0=\diver(p^\Psi u)=r\,u\cdot\nabla(p^\Psi/r).

Such weighted divergence-free fields span every tangent space. Indeed, in a ball around q0q_0, choose j≠kj\ne k, a compact χ\chi equal to r(q0)(qk−q0k)r(q_0)(q_k-q_{0k}) near q0q_0, and set

u=r−1((∂kχ)ej−(∂jχ)ek). u=r^{-1}\big((\partial_k\chi)e_j-(\partial_j\chi)e_k\big).

This field has div⁡(ru)=0\diver(ru)=0 and u(q0)=eju(q_0)=e_j. Therefore ∇(pΨ/r)=0\nabla(p^\Psi/r)=0. Connectedness of Rd\R^d and normalization prove the assertion.

□
Remark 3.4 (The line exception)

For one scalar coordinate let r=∣Ψ∣2/∥Ψ∥22r=|\Psi|^2/\norm{\Psi}_2^2 and FΨ(x)=∫−∞xr(s) dsF^\Psi(x)=\int_{-\infty}^x r(s)\,ds. For any positive smooth gg on [0,1][0,1] with integral one,

pΨ(x)=r(x)g(FΨ(x)) p^\Psi(x)=r(x)g(F^\Psi(x))

is normalized, projective, and has the stated functional regularity. The continuity equation with vanishing flux at infinity gives (∂t+v∂x)FΨ=0(\partial_t+v\partial_x)F^\Psi=0, proving equivariance for every scalar potential and positive mass. The assignment also has the approximation continuity above. A nonconstant gg, for example 1+αcos⁡(2πs)1+\alpha\cos(2\pi s) with 0<∣α∣<10<|\alpha|<1, gives a non-Born law. This is the exception discussed in [6, Section 8]. Local circulation in dimension at least two is essential to proposition 3.3.