# References

<!-- Complete sealed-or-leaky web edition. Mathematical macros used below:
\status = \textbf{[#1]}\quad
\TV = \mathrm{TV}
\BC = \mathrm{BC}
\tr = \operatorname{tr}
\Prb = \mathbb P
\E = \mathbb E
\ket = \lvert#1\rangle
\bra = \langle#1\rvert
\fl = \lfloor#1\rfloor
\fr = \operatorname{fr}
\one = \mathbf1
\idm = \operatorname{id}
\cM = \mathcal M
\cE = \mathcal E
\cD = \mathcal D
\cK = \mathcal K
\cH = \mathcal H
\cC = \mathcal C
\fE = \mathfrak E
\fD = \mathfrak D
\lab = \texttt{#1}
\Dg = \Delta_{\mathrm{gas}}
\dd = \,\mathrm d
\Law = \operatorname{Law}
\fNS = f_{\mathrm{NS}}
\fQ = f_{\mathrm{Q}}
-->

## Bibliography

<a id="bib-Marvian20"></a>

[1] I. Marvian, Inaccessible information in probabilistic models of quantum systems, non-contextuality inequalities and noise thresholds for contextuality, arXiv:2003.05984 (2020), [https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.05984](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.05984).

Cited in: [Section 8](/sealed-or-leaky/what-a-quantum-preparation-description-necessarily-omits#citation-29)

<a id="bib-BB95"></a>

[2] E. G. Beltrametti and S. Bugajski, A classical extension of quantum mechanics, *J. Phys. A* **28** (1995), 3329–3343; [https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/28/12/007](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/28/12/007).

Cited in: [Section 2](/sealed-or-leaky/the-source-tetralemma#citation-11) · [Section 4](/sealed-or-leaky/the-escape-routes-and-their-boundaries#citation-22) · [Section 8](/sealed-or-leaky/what-a-quantum-preparation-description-necessarily-omits#citation-27)

<a id="bib-Bell64"></a>

[3] J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, *Physics* **1** (1964), 195–200. [doi:10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195).

Cited in: [Section 14](/sealed-or-leaky/what-the-results-establish-about-source-reality#citation-43)

<a id="bib-CHSH69"></a>

[4] J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony and R. A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **23** (1969), 880–884. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880).

Cited in: [Section 12](/sealed-or-leaky/setting-dependence-controlled-nonequilibrium-and-access#citation-33) · [Section 14](/sealed-or-leaky/what-the-results-establish-about-source-reality#citation-43)

<a id="bib-CR11"></a>

[5] R. Colbeck and R. Renner, No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power, *Nat. Commun.* **2** (2011), 411. [doi:10.1038/ncomms1416](https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1416).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-5) · [Section 14](/sealed-or-leaky/what-the-results-establish-about-source-reality#citation-44)

<a id="bib-G90"></a>

[6] N. Gisin, Weinberg's non-linear quantum mechanics and supraluminal communications, *Phys. Lett. A* **143** (1990), 1–2. [doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90786-N](https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(90)90786-N).

Cited in: [Section 12](/sealed-or-leaky/setting-dependence-controlled-nonequilibrium-and-access#citation-38)

<a id="bib-MPKRS16"></a>

[7] M. D. Mazurek, M. F. Pusey, R. Kunjwal, K. J. Resch and R. W. Spekkens, An experimental test of noncontextuality without unphysical idealizations, *Nat. Commun.* **7** (2016), 11780. [doi:10.1038/ncomms11780](https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11780).

Cited in: [Section 8](/sealed-or-leaky/what-a-quantum-preparation-description-necessarily-omits#citation-26)

<a id="bib-P91"></a>

[8] J. Polchinski, Weinberg's nonlinear quantum mechanics and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **66** (1991), 397–400. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.397](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.397).

Cited in: [Section 12](/sealed-or-leaky/setting-dependence-controlled-nonequilibrium-and-access#citation-39)

<a id="bib-PBR12"></a>

[9] M. F. Pusey, J. Barrett and T. Rudolph, On the reality of the quantum state, *Nat. Phys.* **8** (2012), 475–478. [doi:10.1038/nphys2309](https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2309).

Cited in: [Section 14](/sealed-or-leaky/what-the-results-establish-about-source-reality#citation-45)

<a id="bib-R6"></a>

[10] J. Rodgers, *Non-Source Projection and Internal Identifiability*, Shadow Theory Paper 6, canonical edition (15 July 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.21371451](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21371451).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-1)

<a id="bib-RM"></a>

[11] J. Rodgers, *Shadow Theory and Quantum Measurement: Source Dynamics, Event Laws, and Physical Records—Two Constitutive Completions*, integrated monograph, version 2 (15 September 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.22774584](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22774584); source: [https://www.everythingequation.com/publications/quantum-measurement/monograph.tex](https://www.everythingequation.com/publications/quantum-measurement/monograph.tex).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-2) · [Section 10](/sealed-or-leaky/the-measurement-constitutions-and-the-scope-of-their-sealing#citation-30) · [Section 11](/sealed-or-leaky/finite-pilot-resources-exact-inventories-and-retained-records#citation-32) · [Section 12](/sealed-or-leaky/setting-dependence-controlled-nonequilibrium-and-access#citation-37)

<a id="bib-S05"></a>

[12] R. W. Spekkens, Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements, *Phys. Rev. A* **71** (2005), 052108. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052108](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052108).

Cited in: [Section 4](/sealed-or-leaky/the-escape-routes-and-their-boundaries#citation-22) · [Section 8](/sealed-or-leaky/what-a-quantum-preparation-description-necessarily-omits#citation-28)

<a id="bib-V02"></a>

[13] A. Valentini, Signal-locality in hidden-variables theories, *Phys. Lett. A* **297** (2002), 273–278; [arXiv:quant-ph/0106098](https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0106098).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-5) · [Section 4](/sealed-or-leaky/the-escape-routes-and-their-boundaries#citation-24) · [Section 12](/sealed-or-leaky/setting-dependence-controlled-nonequilibrium-and-access#citation-34)

<a id="bib-R1"></a>

[14] J. Rodgers, Source–Readout Non-Equivalence: Descent and Equivariant Reconstruction Obstructions, Shadow Theory Paper 1, canonical edition (15 July 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.21369967](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21369967).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-1)

<a id="bib-R2"></a>

[15] J. Rodgers, Target-Relative Necessity of Completion: When Readout Loss Obstructs, and What a Sufficient Extension Must Retain, Shadow Theory Paper 2, canonical edition (15 July 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.21370501](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21370501).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-1)

<a id="bib-R3"></a>

[16] J. Rodgers, Canonical Minimal Source Completion: The Coarsest Readout Extension on Which a Nominated Family of Source Relations Becomes Well Defined, Shadow Theory Paper 3, canonical edition (15 July 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.21370763](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21370763).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-1)

<a id="bib-R4"></a>

[17] J. Rodgers, Geometric Realization of Completed Source Relations: Descent, Orbit Spaces, Invariant Relations, and Variational Response in Shadow Theory, Shadow Theory Paper 4, canonical edition (15 July 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.21370985](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21370985).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-1)

<a id="bib-R5"></a>

[18] J. Rodgers, Observable Quotients and Exact Projected Dynamics: Closure, Memory, Minimal Dynamical Completion, and Effective Field Operators, Shadow Theory Paper 5, canonical edition (15 July 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.21371251](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21371251).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-1)

<a id="bib-R7"></a>

[19] J. Rodgers, *Bulk-to-Brane Projection, Dynamical Nonclosure, and Observable Residues in Randall–Sundrum Gravity*, Shadow Theory Paper 7, canonical edition (15 July 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.21371861](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21371861).

Cited in: 

<a id="bib-Pilot"></a>

[20] J. Rodgers, A Deterministic Pilot Medium: Bell Path Selection and Autonomous Material Records—A Constitutive Completion with a Controlled Physical-Time Limit, version 2 (15 September 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.22774634](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22774634); source: [https://www.everythingequation.com/publications/quantum-measurement/pilot-medium.tex](https://www.everythingequation.com/publications/quantum-measurement/pilot-medium.tex).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-2) · [Section 11](/sealed-or-leaky/finite-pilot-resources-exact-inventories-and-retained-records#citation-31)

<a id="bib-Massive"></a>

[21] J. Rodgers, A Massive Configuration Completion of the Quantum Measurement Programme: Event Timing, Semibounded Material Records, Retained Resources, and an Autonomous Finite-Horizon Realization, version 2 (15 September 2026), [doi:10.5281/zenodo.22774739](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22774739); source: [https://www.everythingequation.com/publications/quantum-measurement/massive-configuration.tex](https://www.everythingequation.com/publications/quantum-measurement/massive-configuration.tex).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-2)

<a id="bib-Pironio10"></a>

[22] S. Pironio, A. Acín, S. Massar, A. Boyer de la Giroday, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, D. Hayes, L. Luo, T. A. Manning and C. Monroe, Random numbers certified by Bell's theorem, *Nature* **464** (2010), 1021–1024; [arXiv:0911.3427](https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.3427). [doi:10.1038/nature09008](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09008).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-5) · [Section 2](/sealed-or-leaky/the-source-tetralemma#citation-7) · [Section 3](/sealed-or-leaky/experimental-anchoring#citation-19) · [Section 13](/sealed-or-leaky/assumptions-and-result-status#citation-42)

<a id="bib-Hensen15"></a>

[23] B. Hensen et al., Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, *Nature* **526** (2015), 682–686. [doi:10.1038/nature15759](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15759).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-3) · [Section 3](/sealed-or-leaky/experimental-anchoring#citation-13)

<a id="bib-Giustina15"></a>

[24] M. Giustina et al., Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **115** (2015), 250401. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401).

Cited in: [Section 3](/sealed-or-leaky/experimental-anchoring#citation-16)

<a id="bib-Shalm15"></a>

[25] L. K. Shalm et al., Strong loophole-free test of local realism, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **115** (2015), 250402. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402).

Cited in: [Section 3](/sealed-or-leaky/experimental-anchoring#citation-16)

<a id="bib-Rosenfeld17"></a>

[26] W. Rosenfeld, D. Burchardt, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, N. Ortegel, M. Rau and H. Weinfurter, Event-ready Bell test using entangled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **119** (2017), 010402. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.010402](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.010402).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-3) · [Section 3](/sealed-or-leaky/experimental-anchoring#citation-14)

<a id="bib-Storz23"></a>

[27] S. Storz et al., Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits, *Nature* **617** (2023), 265–270. [doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05885-0](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05885-0).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-3) · [Section 3](/sealed-or-leaky/experimental-anchoring#citation-15)

<a id="bib-Bierhorst18"></a>

[28] P. Bierhorst, E. Knill, S. Glancy, Y. Zhang, A. Mink, S. Jordan, A. Rommal, Y.-K. Liu, B. Christensen, S. W. Nam, M. J. Stevens and L. K. Shalm, Experimentally generated randomness certified by the impossibility of superluminal signals, *Nature* **556** (2018), 223–226; [arXiv:1803.06219v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06219v1) (including supplementary information, Eqs. (2)–(6), Table 1, SI S.2, S.5–S.7). [doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0019-0](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0019-0).

Cited in: [Section 1](/sealed-or-leaky/question-main-result-and-scope#citation-4) · [Section 3](/sealed-or-leaky/experimental-anchoring#citation-20) · [Section 13](/sealed-or-leaky/assumptions-and-result-status#citation-40)

<a id="bib-Audenaert07"></a>

[29] K. M. R. Audenaert, A sharp continuity estimate for the von Neumann entropy, *J. Phys. A* **40** (2007), 8127–8136; [arXiv:quant-ph/0610146](https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610146), Theorem 1.

Cited in: [Section 13](/sealed-or-leaky/assumptions-and-result-status#citation-41)

<a id="bib-Everett57"></a>

[30] H. Everett, “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics, *Rev. Mod. Phys.* **29** (1957), 454–462. [doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454](https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454).

Cited in: [Section 2](/sealed-or-leaky/the-source-tetralemma#citation-8) · [Section 4](/sealed-or-leaky/the-escape-routes-and-their-boundaries#citation-21)

<a id="bib-Deutsch99"></a>

[31] D. Deutsch, Quantum theory of probability and decisions, *Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A* **455** (1999), 3129–3137; [arXiv:quant-ph/9906015](https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9906015).

Cited in: [Section 2](/sealed-or-leaky/the-source-tetralemma#citation-8) · [Section 4](/sealed-or-leaky/the-escape-routes-and-their-boundaries#citation-21)

<a id="bib-Wallace12"></a>

[32] D. Wallace, *The Emergent Multiverse*, Oxford University Press, 2012.

Cited in: [Section 2](/sealed-or-leaky/the-source-tetralemma#citation-8) · [Section 4](/sealed-or-leaky/the-escape-routes-and-their-boundaries#citation-21)

<a id="bib-GRW86"></a>

[33] G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini and T. Weber, Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems, *Phys. Rev. D* **34** (1986), 470–491. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.470](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.470).

Cited in: [Section 2](/sealed-or-leaky/the-source-tetralemma#citation-9)

<a id="bib-Donadi21"></a>

[34] S. Donadi, K. Piscicchia, C. Curceanu, L. Diósi, M. Laubenstein and A. Bassi, Underground test of gravity-related wave function collapse, *Nature Phys.* **17** (2021), 74–78. [doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1008-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-1008-4).

Cited in: 

<a id="bib-Brans88"></a>

[35] C. H. Brans, Bell's theorem does not eliminate fully causal hidden variables, *Int. J. Theor. Phys.* **27** (1988), 219–226. [doi:10.1007/BF00670750](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00670750).

Cited in: [Section 2](/sealed-or-leaky/the-source-tetralemma#citation-10) · [Section 4](/sealed-or-leaky/the-escape-routes-and-their-boundaries#citation-23)

<a id="bib-HossenfelderPalmer20"></a>

[36] S. Hossenfelder and T. Palmer, Rethinking superdeterminism, *Front. Phys.* **8** (2020), 139. [doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00139](https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00139).

Cited in: 

<a id="bib-Handsteiner17"></a>

[37] J. Handsteiner et al., Cosmic Bell test: measurement settings from Milky Way stars, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **118** (2017), 060401. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.060401](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.060401).

Cited in: 

<a id="bib-Rauch18"></a>

[38] D. Rauch et al., Cosmic Bell test using random measurement settings from high-redshift quasars, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **121** (2018), 080403. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.080403](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.080403).

Cited in: 

<a id="bib-BigBell18"></a>

[39] The BIG Bell Test Collaboration, Challenging local realism with human choices, *Nature* **557** (2018), 212–216. [doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0085-3](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0085-3).

Cited in: 

<a id="bib-Bohm52"></a>

[40] D. Bohm, A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I, *Phys. Rev.* **85** (1952), 166–179. [doi:10.1103/PhysRev.85.166](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.166).

Cited in: